<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JusticeTimes.com &#187; Amend The Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justicetimes.com/category/amend-the-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justicetimes.com</link>
	<description>Your Non-Partisan Watchdog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Workplace Politics Charts the Path&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2010/02/20/why-workplace-politics-charts-the-path/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2010/02/20/why-workplace-politics-charts-the-path/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battlefield Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game of politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulative behaviors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organizational politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team of commandos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace politicking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Damian D Pitts   &#8230;to Build Great Teams and Performance For Organizations   When most people hear the phrase &#8220;organizational politics,&#8221; they react very negatively. They see politics in the workplace as forming clicks and another way to keep those who go against the status quo labeled as an outsider.   People also think that it&#8217;s a toxic dynamic that allows manipulative behaviors for people to get what they want by stepping on their co-workers&#8217; backs. But not every instance of workplace politicking is a selfish maneuver to win.   The text &#8220;Building Great Teams: Charting the Path of Organizational Politics&#8221; (Book Surge, 2007) takes you inside one of the greatest team building organizations in the world, the United States Marine Corps, to examine and discover the strategies that business leaders must be willing to learn, use and employ for building ordinary groups into extraordinary teams; leading the right team of commandos who understand what it takes to win on the business battlefield and defeat workplace politics using warfare as the key to experience a significant win. The strategies within the text defines workplace and office politics as &#8220;the path to smart growth&#8230;using the power to accelerate the careers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2010/02/20/why-workplace-politics-charts-the-path/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queen Air Mattress &#8211; Comfortable and Convenient</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2010/02/20/queen-air-mattress-comfortable-and-convenient/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2010/02/20/queen-air-mattress-comfortable-and-convenient/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camping air mattress.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queen air mattress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Janet Chua Understanding The New Air Supported Mattresses Things and events such as a friend or a relative coming to visit, or your kid asking you to have her friends over for a sleep over usually come to us unexpectedly. You&#8217;ll never know when those kinds of things will happen, so it&#8217;s best if you are always prepared. Having a queen air mattress is a convenient and handy solution for you to stay prepared for these kinds of events.   If you are a person who loves to sleep outdoors, then you have more reasons to get one of those big and comfortable air mattresses. Don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s going to be just one household item that you will stock in your garage for months, waiting for the next opportunity to be used. I&#8217;m sure it will prove itself to be an extremely useful purchase. For instance, as much as you love nature and the wild, no one fancies sleeping inside a tent on hard and rough ground, more so after a long day of trailing in the woods or mountains. A good queen air mattress will give you something to look forward to at the end of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2010/02/20/queen-air-mattress-comfortable-and-convenient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Rule Prohibiting Unwanted &#8220;Robocalls&#8221; Take Effect</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/09/12/new-rule-prohibiting-unwanted-robocalls-take-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/09/12/new-rule-prohibiting-unwanted-robocalls-take-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing calls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels, Ph.D.   Telemarketers Must Obtain Prior Written Approval from Consumers Who Want to Receive Such Calls   Beginning September 1, 2009, prerecorded commercial telemarketing calls to consumers – commonly known as robocalls – will be prohibited, unless the telemarketer has obtained permission in writing from consumers who want to receive such calls, the Federal Trade Commission announced today.   “American consumers have made it crystal clear that few things annoy them more than the billions of commercial telemarketing robocalls they receive every year,” said Jon Leibowitz, Chairman of the FTC. “Starting September 1, this bombardment of prerecorded pitches, senseless solicitations, and malicious marketing will be illegal. If consumers think they’re being harassed by robocallers, they need to let us know, and we will go after them.”   The new requirement is part of amendments to the agency’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) that were announced a year ago. After September 1, sellers and telemarketers who transmit prerecorded messages to consumers who have not agreed in writing to accept such messages will face penalties of up to $16,000 per call.   The rule amendments going into effect on September 1 do not prohibit calls that deliver purely “informational” recorded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/09/12/new-rule-prohibiting-unwanted-robocalls-take-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Lied About Firearms Intentions</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/04/18/obama-lied-about-firearms-intentions/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/04/18/obama-lied-about-firearms-intentions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amend The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crooked Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Owner Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malice aforethought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modus operandi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Terrorist List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels, Ph.D. &#8211; Sponsored by Real Gear for Real Bikers, Legalzoom and Jurisdictionary Notice:  All Gun Owners on Obama Terrorist List Preface:  The Obama Administration is turning out to be the greediest bunch of freedom depriving terrorists ever to occupy the Whitehouse. The Homeland Security Paranoids are at it again.  A few or their minions have introduced H.R. 45 to take away our liberties even more!  First of all just remember, the Conservative Political Philosophy comprises 3 basic concepts, that being Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. H.R. 45 reduces your personal liberty like never before.  It violates the 10th Amendment as well.  The Federal Government literally has no authority to regulate onshore firearms.  None whatsoever.  That power was NOT granted by the U.S. Constitution and on top of that was specifically prohibited by the 2nd and the 10th Amendments. Point 1:  The 2nd Amendment specifically tells the Federal Government to keep their greasy paws off our firearms and the 10th Amendment tells them they can&#8217;t even make a law to give them the power to do so. Point 2:  The Federal Government is the creation of the States.  Not the other way around.  The U.S. Constitution is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/04/18/obama-lied-about-firearms-intentions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crooked CPAs Cook The Books</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/04/14/crooked-cpas-cook-the-books/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/04/14/crooked-cpas-cook-the-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amend The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate casino capitalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Access Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Accounting Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honest CPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propagandists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Nader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Bartels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels, Ph.D. - Sponsored by Real Gear for Real Bikers, Legalzoom and Jurisdictionary May We Hear From an Honest CPA? One of the primary functions of the free press in the United States is to be an ever-vigilant watchdog over politics.  But the mainstream press has failed to act as watchdogs and have instead become propagandists.  It is Internet Journalists who have taken up the watchdog roles the public wants to depend upon.  More and more people are getting their information from the Internet instead of television, except the fast growing Fox News Channel, and most major newspapers. This is why the major newspapers are losing money, like kids lose homework assignments, and some are going out of business.  Who wants to pay a newspaper subscription fee for propaganda?  The old media can&#8217;t be trusted and neither can some of the new media.  However there ate plenty of great Internet Journalists plugging away at research and reporting. Former Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader has written an article for his Website lambasting the CPA profession for standing by while Wall Street firms &#8220;used the latest tricks to cook the books.&#8221; The frequent presidential candidate criticized the Big Four auditing firms in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/04/14/crooked-cpas-cook-the-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real ID Spy Chip &#8211; Approved by Homeland Security</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/03/02/real-id-spy-chip-approved-by-homeland-security/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/03/02/real-id-spy-chip-approved-by-homeland-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governmental Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(202) 282-9829]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AntiChips.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director of the Federal Register]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced driver's licenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Albrecht]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State Rep. Paul Opsommer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Opsommer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAL ID Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAL ID Act of 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAL ID Program Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real ID Spy Chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAL ID-compliant cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Bartels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spychip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spychip driver's license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpyChips.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels, Ph.D. &#8211; Sponsored by Legalzoom and Jurisdictionary Source:  Homeland Security Department Do You Want Your Privacy Invaded Even More?   Your privacy lost sure is real change from Obama!  Now you will have to have a spy chip (RFID Chip) put on your driver&#8217;s license unless you object long enough and loud enough to get the Obama Administration to cancel this mandate.  Right after this paragraph is the actual wording from the Government Website.   SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is establishing minimum standards for State-issued driver&#8217;s licenses and identification cards that Federal agencies would accept for official purposes on or after May 11, 2008, in accordance with the REAL ID Act of 2005. This rule establishes standards to meet the minimum requirements of the REAL ID Act of 2005. These standards involve a number of aspects of the process used to issue identification documents, including: Information and security features that must be incorporated into each card; application information to establish the identity and immigration status of an applicant before a card can be issued; and physical security standards for facilities where driver&#8217;s licenses and applicable identification cards are produced. This final rule also provides a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/03/02/real-id-spy-chip-approved-by-homeland-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe The Plumber &#8211; Now</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/26/joe-the-plumber-now/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/26/joe-the-plumber-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe The Plumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Bartels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels, Ph.D. &#8211; Sponsored by Legalzoom and Jurisdictionary Recommended by Justicetimes.com Fighting for the American Dream Very few people stay in the public eye as well as Joe The Plumber has, after his 15 minutes of fame.  However, Joe is unique for being so much like mainstream Americans.  Most folks who attain their 15 minutes of fame are unusual.  Joe is usual and therein lies his appeal.    He understands the struggles of everyday life.  He knows that most folks lives of quiet desperation much of the time but keep on plugging on for love of God, Family and Country. Synopsis &#8220;Joe The Plumber&#8221; was catapulted into the media spotlight after asking, then Senator Barack Obama a simple question while he campaigned in Joe&#8217;s neighborhood. Their famous exchange has been replayed for millions of viewers the world over. Joe has since become an international folk hero and the ultimate icon of the working class.   But what you will discover about this simple Plumber from Ohio will reach deep down into your soul and inspire that spark of the American Dream that lives within is us all.   Joe The Plumber &#8211; Fighting for the American Dream vividly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/26/joe-the-plumber-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial Tyranny</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/25/judicial-tyranny/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/25/judicial-tyranny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amend The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of NEGATIVE Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engel v. Vitale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalist Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fields v. Palmdale School District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founding Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Jay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY v. ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence v. Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madsen v. Women's Health Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCreay County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newdow v. U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Original American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel L. et al v. Superior Court of California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sphere of authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stone v. Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=2147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels, Ph.D. &#8211; Sponsored by Legalzoom and Jurisdictionary Publisher&#8217;s Note:  The 10 Cases are at the bottom of this article.  The documentation in between here and the 10 cases are the foundation premises for authenticating this article. 10 Landmark Decisions That Have Destroyed Much of Our Original American Culture This article examines the &#8220;Philosophical Origins and Intents of Our Founding Fathers&#8221; vs. &#8220;Current Judicial Tyranny.&#8221;   Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay wrote a set of 85 essays known as the Federalist Papers between October 1787 and August 1788.   Question:  What was the purpose of the Federalist Papers?   Answer:  To explain and advocate for the ratification of the newly-proposed U.S. Constitution, drafted during the summer of 1787 at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention.   Several of those essays dealt with Article III of the Constitution concerning the powers and duties of the federal judiciary. In Federalist #78, authored by Hamilton, we gain a clear understanding of the Founding Fathers&#8217; view on the limits on judicial power:   Direct Quote: &#8211; &#8220;the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/25/judicial-tyranny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Gambling: Is it Legal?</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/10/online-gambling-is-it-legal/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/10/online-gambling-is-it-legal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Education Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law on online gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legality of making bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online casinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Gaming Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outside of the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placing wagers online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playing online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker rooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US citizens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=1904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Katherine Butler, Sponsored by Legalzoom Not Understanding The Online Gaming Laws May Be Harmful To Your Liberty The legality of online gambling is ever-changing. But one thing is constant: it makes a lot of money. In 1997, online gambling revenues were about $200 million a year. Today, the online gambling industry makes an estimated one billion dollars annually. This is a huge business, and a lot of people have cashed in on it. But it has led to some ambiguous legal issues, as the legality of online gambling is constantly being challenged. There are differences in the legality of making bets, taking bets, facilitating payments to casinos, and advertising on websites. And there are constantly new legal challenges. So here is a breakdown of the law on online gambling. Definitely Legal As there is no federal law against playing online, simply placing wagers online is legal. (However, a wager must NOT be placed on a site located in the United States. More on that later.) There is a small chance players might run afoul of state law, but there is little chance of prosecution. The only case cited where a person got into trouble with a state was in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/10/online-gambling-is-it-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pollo e Verdura da Ronomundo Bartellini</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/10/pollo-e-verdura-da-ronomundo-bartellini/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/10/pollo-e-verdura-da-ronomundo-bartellini/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encouragement for Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart smart lunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just for the Health of It]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama stimulus plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow food restaurants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=1899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels Just for the Health of It!   (I pezzi di seno di sauteed di pollo con assortito hanno trattato con vapore la verdura.) Coursely cut Pieces of Breast of Chicken Tender, Seasoned with Oregano, Sauteed in Grape Seed Oil, Surrounded by Steamed Slivered Carrots, Brocoli Florets, Baby Corn, Sliced Water Chestnuts, Snow Peas, Slivered Red Bell Pepper and Sliced Mushrooms.  (I Pezzi di taglio corsi di Seno di Pollo Tenero, con esperienza con Oregano, Sauteed nell&#8217;Olio di Semenza di Uva, Circondato da Hanno Trattato con vapore Slivered Carote, Brocoli Florets, Granoturco di Bambino, Ha Affettato Castagne di Acqua, i Piselli di Neve, Slivered il Pepe di Campana Rosso ed i Funghi Affettati.) Served with Welche&#8217;s Grape Juice.  (Il succo dell&#8217;uva di Concordia dolce.) Enjoy this heart-smart lunch!  (Piacere questo pranzo cuore-intelligente!) You will never get this at a fast food restaurant unless I license it to them.  Shucks, how many slow food restaurants would serve up such a delicate item? By the way, this is not in the Obama Stimulus Plan either but the cost is only $2.07 made from scratch.  This is my version of a stimulus plan with healthcare included.  It did NOT cost a Trillion Dollars either. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/02/10/pollo-e-verdura-da-ronomundo-bartellini/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is a Bailout Bill &#8211; Not a Bailout Bill?</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2009/01/29/when-is-a-bailout-bill-not-a-bailout-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2009/01/29/when-is-a-bailout-bill-not-a-bailout-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governmental Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Dog Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am from the Government and I'm here to help you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[made in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy the Nanny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanny State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Bartels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexually responsible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slush fund legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Engineering Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social re-engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wicked Witch of the West]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=1858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels The Title Should Correctly Be Entitled:   The Obama Social Engineering Plan   This bill is not a economic stimulus plan.  The bill is packed full of social re-engineering and Corporate Welfare which will just bog down the economy even more.  It does not address employment except in very indirect ways, which is probably why Joe Biden says the economy will get worse before it gets better.   This bill is a social engineer&#8217;s dream bill, which is being rushed through Congress under the guise of economic stimulus.  In the House of Representatives, all of the Republicans and many of the Blue Dog Democrats voted against this social slush fund legislation.  Much of this bill will have to be revoked later when the American Public awakens to the nightmarish reality that they have a much heavier burden to bare than ever before.   This financial impact of this depressing bill will be blamed on Conservatives (177 Republicans and 11 Democrats)though none of them in the house supported the legislation, including the Democratic Party&#8217;s Financial Conservatives. This bill is not really a partisan battle so much as it is a battle of competing ideologies.  The Nanny State vs. Personal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2009/01/29/when-is-a-bailout-bill-not-a-bailout-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Justice When Justice is the Criminal</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/criminal-justice-when-justice-is-the-criminal/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/criminal-justice-when-justice-is-the-criminal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amend The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Access Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Subject at a Time Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read the bill act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels Watchdog Report CIA Admits Lies About Missionary Deaths November 21, 2008 &#8211; An investigation by the agency&#8217;s inspector general finds that officials covered up details of the 2001 incident over Peru that killed two Americans and wounded three other people.  The purpose of the cover-up was to hide agency negligence in the downing of a private airplane over Peru in 2001 as part of a mistaken attack on an aircraft suspected of carrying illegal narcotics. An internal CIA report released Thursday accuses agency officials of lying to members of Congress and withholding crucial information from criminal investigators and senior Bush administration officials.  The disclosure could lead to the reopening of a probe into whether agency officials committed crimes in the attack on the aircraft, which was transporting American missionaries, and then covering it up. One of our concerns is whether or not there will be a special prosecutor and how many heads will roll up the chain-of-command. The shoot-down of the missionary airplane killed Veronica Bowers, her infant daughter and injured three others, including Bowers&#8217; husband and young son. The air to air attack was carried out by a Peruvian warplane working with CIA surveillance craft.  These [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/criminal-justice-when-justice-is-the-criminal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll:  Arkansans Want Pot Law Change</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/poll-arkansans-want-pot-law-change/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/poll-arkansans-want-pot-law-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amend The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Access Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Subject at a Time Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read the bill act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels Criminal Justice -Narrow Majority Favors Decriminalization $10,400 Per Arrest for Less Than One Ounce? &#8211; Is it Worth It? November 21, 2008 - A recent Zogby International poll commissioned by the Arkansas-based Drug Policy Education Group has found that a slight majority of respondents favor decriminalization of the adult use and possession of marijuana. The poll was conducted November 7-11 and was based on a Zogby online panel of 436 voters deemed by Zogby to be representative of the state&#8217;s adult population. The margin of error was +/- 4.8%. Respondents were asked the following question: &#8220;In 2007, over 7,400 adults were arrested in Arkansas for misdemeanor possession of one ounce or less of marijuana, over half the state&#8217;s total drug arrests. According to a national 2005 study, state and local governments spend an average of $10,400 per arrest on police, courts, and jails. Based on that estimate, 2007 marijuana arrests will cost Arkansas taxpayers nearly $77 million dollars. Knowing this information, would you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose a law that would eliminate the penalties for adult marijuana possession of one ounce or less?&#8221; Slightly more than 35% strongly supported changing the pot [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/poll-arkansans-want-pot-law-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Enforcement: This Week&#8217;s Corrupt Cops Stories</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/law-enforcement-this-weeks-corrupt-cops-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/law-enforcement-this-weeks-corrupt-cops-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amend The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Access Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Subject at a Time Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read the bill act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Bartels Law Enforcement Needs to be Monitored to kept Just and Fair Former Nogales, AZ officer convicted on 4 counts In Nogales, Arizona, a former Nogales DARE officer was convicted last Friday on numerous charges related to unwanted sexual contact with young women. Ramon Borbon, 40, was convicted of sexual abuse and obstructing a criminal investigation in the case of a 16-year-old girl whom he forced to touch him inappropriately and threatened to stop her from going to authorities. He was also convicted of sexual assault and kidnapping charges in the case of a 19-year-old woman for restraining and raping her. He was in uniform during both incidents. In a motion ruling during trial, Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge James Soto wrote that Borbon has &#8220;a character trait which gives rise to an aberrant sexual propensity&#8221; and that he appeared to have &#8220;identified young, vulnerable females with a history of psychological and/or substance abuse problems that are less likely to come forward and if they do, are less likely to be considered credible.&#8221; There are also at least four other complaints of sexual abuse against Borbon. The police department had earlier found them to be &#8220;without merit.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/21/law-enforcement-this-weeks-corrupt-cops-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Drug Tests Are 100% Wrong</title>
		<link>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/19/when-drug-tests-are-100-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/19/when-drug-tests-are-100-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronomundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amend The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoQ10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Access Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankincense Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hashish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Subject at a Time Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic Tea Tree Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read the bill act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justicetimes.com/?p=1447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by D. L. Sletrab Editor&#8217;s NOTE: This article was written by a person who has never used a single street drug but has a passion for simple justice and freedom. The War on Drugs &#8211; War On The 10th Amendment &#8211; An Ongoing Miscarriage of Justice The Innocent Suffer &#8211; But It Affects Us All What do Ron Obadia, Nadine Artemis and Hashish have in common?  Let us reword the question.  What do Organic Tea Tree Oil, Frankincense Oil, CoQ10, Raw Chocolate and Hashish have in common?  Answer:  They all test positive for THC.  NOTE: Tetrahydrocannabinol, also known as THC, Δ9-THC, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), Δ1-tetrahydrocannabinol (using an older chemical nomenclature), or dronabinol, is the main psychoactive substance found in the Cannabis plant. The Canadian and United States Federal Governments&#8217; war on drugs is expensive and has failed.  What have the taxpayers gained?  Is the country free from drugs?  Street pharmacists operate everywhere.  Sometimes the innocent pay.  That is what this story is about.  However, we don&#8217;t just cover the tragedy, we offer a solution.  We point out that Canadian and U.S. Governments are out of control and getting worse by the day. If we took a poll, we could ask the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justicetimes.com/2008/11/19/when-drug-tests-are-100-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

